I speak of course, of the troll wars pertaining to Linux vs Windows vs Mac. Now, unfortunately, Macs tend to get away pretty well in these arguments, because regardless of how much open source software they steal and how much they try to push forward the boundaries of Vendor Lock-In, they are still the under dog in comparison to Microsoft, so MOST people, tend to leave them alone. The troll wars that I am particularly interested in, are those that follow the blog posts of a certain Steven J Vaughan-Nichols (Or SJVN to most of us). You see this is a very seasoned journalist, who has got a LOT of experience in the world of I.T. and he has a tendency to make rather straight forward blog posts. Only this morning I read one on Windows 7 and how good it was, yet immediately after, I read another which claimed Ubuntu 9.10 was better and gave the reasons why he thought so, the post about Windows being good, had barely a bad word said in the comments, no Linux fans jumping in there saying how much Windows sucks or that it’s a crap OS, yet the other post, whoohoohoohoo out come the zealots, and then the defenders of the faith.

To me he’s in a pretty good position to make reasoned, educated postings about the ups, downs, benefits and disadvantages to various software and operating systems, he has experience from all sides, has been doing it all for some time now, and he gets paid to do it, for some reason however, not everyone seems to agree with me. These days, the second SJVN says a single word against an MS product, all hell breaks loose. Someone from the Windows camp will jump in and instead of simply refuting the claim against Windows, they will begin a whole toilet roll (Yes I said Toilet Roll!) of insults against Linux and why it sucks, why it’s a hobbyist OS, why no one should care about an OS (Then why are you bothering to post if you believe no one should care?) and of course a whole load of other crap about how Linux doesn’t upgrade properly, how the people who use Linux are all nasty 43 year old men who still live in their mothers basement etc.etc.etc.

Well you may be asking yourself the same question as most of us Linux users, I understand why Linux users are passionate, I understand why Unix advocates are passionate, BSD, Solaris, whatever flavour you like, their’s usually a reason to be passionate, the same goes for open source software in general, there’s a philosophy behind it, there’s even a moral high ground to be taken in some/many cases, but until now, I could not for the life of me think why, anyone would get passionate about Windows, certainly not passionate enough to defend it so much and so publicly. I think however, that I’ve finally cracked it, a lot of people get accused of defending Windows because they get paid to do it, well that may be true in some cases, however I would assume (Now this is never really a good thing to do, but we all do it) that MS would make sure, anyone they paid to make blog posts, counter posts, forum posts etc. relating to their products, would at the very least be able to spell, let alone articulate their point. Otherwise what would be the point in paying someone to do it? So I’ve come to the conclusion, that the people defending Windows, who cannot articulate their points, most of whom don’t even seem to know what their own point is, to articulate it, are simply people who have grown up using MS products, like many of us did, started to rip off Windows a few years ago, then got fed up with the whole “Genuine Advantage” thing and decided to try Linux, not because of it’s morals, or it’s background, or even for it’s stability or security, but instead, for the fact that it was free, and ended up having not a very good time. I personally did something similar several years ago, I got fed up with the BSOD, I got fed up with constantly having to re-validate my Windows XP machine because MS had invented yet another way of checking if your copy of Windows was genuine and yet again got it wrong. So I moved to Fedora Core (Can’t remember which version, 5 I think).

I hated it, with a passion. I hated Gnome (I still do), I hated the fact that my video card didn’t work (a problem that is now well in the past), my sound card didn’t work (Even though it said it did (this problem is also for the most part gone), I also hated that the look of the system in a graphical sense, just didn’t seem as polished, so I re-installed XP and made do for 6 months, before I tried Ubuntu, the hardware handling was much improved by this point, but the system still looked crap, so I started asking around and digging, to find a better desktop environment, what I eventually found, was KDE. I promptly installed Debian and ran that happily for 6 months, before long I was bored with how simple everything seemed to be, and had become curious about what challenges might be out there, I found Gentoo! 1 year and a WHOLE LOT OF BANDWIDTH later, I knew more about Linux than I had ever thought possible and I was completely hooked, my life changed however, and I no longer had time to wait for 2 days while KDE compiled on my AthlonXP processor, so back I went, this time to the KDE version of Ubuntu (Kubuntu).

After all this switching, you might think I’d stay with just one distro, but you’d be wrong, I’ve switched back and forth between Debian, Gentoo, Ubuntu, Fedora and CentOS for years, trying a few others along the way but not as a serious desktop option. Over the last 12 months I’ve been pretty solidly Kubuntu, without even considering any other distro or any other OS, I’ve tested Win7 both on hardware and virtualised, and yes, I must say it’s pretty good, but I still can’t bring down my terminal with an F key (Yakuake), I can’t simply turn on wobbly Windows or transparency or the desktop cube, I can’t rely on it being stable or drop to a command line if the system freezes up, I can’t just reload the X-Server if that freezes, I can’t install new programs, upgrades or drivers without rebooting, I can’t leave it running for 3 weeks and then go back to it and have it be responsive, the list of things I can’t do on Windows of any flavour is huge, the list of things I can’t do but want to on Linux, is limited to one thing and one thing only these days, and that’s run Adobe CS4!

Well I’m sure many of you will realise this, but those of you who are desperately searching for a way to do it and ended up here, I’ve noticed a few people have reported this bug and a few people who are new or newish to Linux trying to install Nvidia drivers and not getting very far with it, so the procedure following will allow you to install your NVidia drivers in a Virtual Terminal and then reboot to your GUI environment:

1) reboot your machine and hold down the SHIFT key as it boots up to get the GRUB menu to appear
2) Select the recovery option for the latest kernel and press enter to boot into recovery mode
3) From the recovery menu select “Drop to a Root Shell” (Doesn’t matter if you choose with networking or not)
4) Once you have a shell prompt type the following > telinit 3
5) You should now be in a root shell at RunLevel 3, allowing you to navigate to the folder that your driver is stored in

IF YOU’VE INSTALLED NVIDIA DRIVERS BEFORE THE REST IS SIMPLE, IF NOT READ ON

6) Once in the folder for your NVidia Driver type the following > sh ./NVIDIA-Linux-*
7) This should give you the basic Shell based Graphical Interface for the installer
The rest is obvious really from the information on screen, however here are a few tips:

Say NO to downloading a pre-compiled version from Nvidia, say yes to compiling one from source and say yes to running nvidia-config to enable the graphics drivers to be used in your xorg.conf file.

You should now have a running NVidia driver in your Karmic Koala installation, simply type > shutdown -r now
Your system will reboot and with any luck, if you’ve chosen the right driver, made the right choices in the installer etc you should see an NVidia splash screen momentarily before seeing the Karmic Login box.

Hope this helps anyone having trouble.